> < ^ Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 10:04:28 +1553
> < ^ From: Alexander Hulpke <hulpke@math.colostate.edu >
< ^ Subject: Re: FieldPolynomialRingOps.StandardAssociate bug in 3r4p3

Dear GAP-Forum,

Helmut Geyer wrote:

FieldPolynomialRingOps.StandardAssociate still has the same bug as
3r4p2 when called with the 0 polynomial:

gap> x:=X(Rationals);
gap> StandardAssociate(0*x);
Error, List Element: <position> must be a positive integer at

Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I can't trace back why this
happened, but obviously this patch somehow fell off the table when preparing
version 3.4.3. We apologize for this error (and hope we will be more
attentive next time).

Alexander Hulpke

> < [top]